Civil Rights Platforms and REALITY 

You really need to read this about who is who in politics. It can open your eyes to who the TRUE civil rights champions are:
                                       

    "New American Nazi Party"

Most of the churches of Germany, the Lutherans for example, were in direct opposition to Hitler. Many were later forced into submission, just as many Christian churches are now being forced into submission by the Democrats. They threaten to tax any church that speaks out openly for the Republican Party or against Democrats. Yet, they allow churches with evil false practices, like Trinity United Church (or whatever the name of the Obama-nation church is), serving their Muslims and abortionists; and other churches practicing gay marriages and other false doctrine. It is blaspheme, but they are allowed and even encouraged by the Democrats. The churches in Nazi Germany were being perverted much like some of those in America today. Many are serving evil with their acceptance of Democrats and their practices.

Hitler even committed suicide on Walpurgis Night, a satanic holiday. Pope Pius XII and Pope Benedict XVI spoke about a demonic possession of Hitler. He lead Germany into an occult like neopagan practice, NOT Christianity! He was basically a Heathen. It is almost funny how the liberals can distort the facts by inferring that the religions practiced by the entire country were one and the same as the cultish practices of an evil socialist dictator, who actually mirrors the direction in which their party is currently heading.

The Nazi position on abortion later lead to euthanasia of those who were handicapped, elderly and sick, mentally ill (even mildly), etc... Then was the persecution of minorities or undesirables. They were forced to be separate or into servitude. This continued both in Germany and the occupied countries. In 1941, Jews were forced to wear a yellow badge in public and most were transferred to live in slums or ghettos, to remain isolated from the rest of the population. Then they took it a SMALL step further and went into a practice of ridding the world of those thought to be less than, by their foremost authority- Hitler and his government.

It is a very similar path to what the Democrats are on in America today and they are already practicing some forms of euthanasia, late term abortions, etc., sprouting from a movement that was supposed to be about protecting Mothers-BS! The founder of Planned Parenthood shared nearly ALL ideologies with Hitler. She primarily started the abortion group to keep down the population of blacks and others she considered "undesirables" in America and has since succeeded in killing millions without risk of persecution or prosecution, because this genocidal practice has become a "civil rights cause" from the party that originally fought to keep slavery.

If traditional religion is absent from the public arena, secular religions, like atheism, paganism, etc., are likely to satisfy man's search for meaning in his life. But these secular beliefs are paramount to faith in nothing, which leads to self-worship, which leads to evil. It was an atheistic belief in man as architect of his own splendor and destiny that show us the true heart of Communism, socialism, fascism and all the horrors they unleashed for the 20th and now the 21st centuries. It was those of faith by standards of traditional religions, like Martin Niemoller, C.S. Lewis, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Reinhold Niebuhr, and Martin Buber, who warned of the tragedy to come from attempting to build man's own version of the New Jerusalem on Earth. The idea of doing so is not an expression of faith in God, but an admission of self-involvement and possibly sociopathic nature.

So we further ourselves more and more from faith and secularize our beliefs, and for what?

We socialize medicine and business and give the government control over all that is good about this country, and for what?

So that our government can have complete control over us, even over our churches and what they teach, like they did in Nazi Germany?

Where is it that you liberal Americans want to go with this?

Are you hoping to build our own Nazi Germany here in America?

OR MAYBE, just maybe you should put on the breaks, put the car in reverse and find all of those values you through out along the drive we call life?

Maybe if we re-examine those values, we’d see that we better watch who we vote for and what they are really up to!

The  

•                                                      <sup><sub>Obama Tax Cuts?
  
  I just saw on tv how the McCain tax cuts would be a greater tax cut for the wealthy than for the middle class. Now Osama uh- I mean Obama is saying (suddenly) that he too will cut taxes. He is also promising a $1,000 stimulus check to about 95% of American families.
  
  Despite pandering to the leftist mentality of how we should penalize rich people, the media on a liberal news station showed the gain for the average American per year with Obama's plan as $168. Under McCain's tax plan it was $1,200. Let's see $1,000 stimulus  + $168 tax savings = $1,168 and the stimulus is only a one-time thing (if he actually kept his tax promises, unlike any other Democrat in history). This means that in the first year under Obama we'd lose $32. Every year after the first year, we'd lose $1,032.
  
  If Obama was president for 8 years, we'd lose about $7,256 per middle class family by their liberal calculations. Of course they didn't actually tell us we'd lose any money, but the math was simple. Now keep in mind, with the big increase in taxes to the rich who employ us middle class folks, we may not even have a job.
  
  Obama also complained that Bush gave Countrywide Motgage a tax break while people were losing their homes. Then he employed a big-wig from Countrywide to run his search for a VP. What he didn't say was that Bush gave those tax breaks to everybody, not Countrywide singled out so that they could take your homes and the tax cuts too. The truth be told, those tax breaks for Countrywide likely saved people's homes and employed people too. I know what Countrywide did was wrong, but it was Obama who employed the likes of their dirty business practices to help him win the election.
  
  Obama for Change and we'll be digging for change in our sofas.
  
  People who believe this political rhetoric and don't back up what they hear with research and facts, don't deserve the right to vote.
  
  God Bless!</sub></sup>
  

To those of you who say the government should stay out of a woman’s business:

I’m not a RACIST! I’m just a bigot!

The origin of the definition from the 15th century: in Old French bigot- an extremely dedicated OR hypocritical person. Isn’t it just like the French to create such a word? The earliest English definition was- a religious hypocrite. It later evolved:

Bigot, by definition (now)-

1)  One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

2)   A person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

3)   A person who constantly and stubbornly holds a particular point of view.

6)      One obstinately and blindly devoted to his own church, party, belief, or opinion.

How many people white, black, brown, red, yellow or green; Christian, Muslim, Jew or other religion; liberal, Conservative or middle of the road; Republican, Democrat or 3^rd Party; above the age of 12, do you know who does NOT fit that definition in some way?

Personally, I fit the definition #3 pretty well. I just can’t look past my own constant and stubborn belief that a baby has a right to be born, despite its race, financial situation or even despite its biological parent’s wish not to have the “burden” of a baby, as Obama would put it.

I actually fit #4 pretty well also. Forgive me for my vehement certainty that Jesus Christ is the son of the ONE God and our one way to salvation.

Forgive me for my bigotry, but I may have a slight distaste for those of another religion specifically (Islam) due to their “innocent” musings regarding my lack of a right to be alive, since I don’t believe as they do.

Forgive me for my bigotry, since I believe as I am taught by the Holy Bible: Murder is unreasonable and wicked.

You shall not murder.

MURDER- the crime of unlawfully and unjustifiably killing another under circumstances defined by statute (as with premeditation); especially: such a crime committed purposely, knowingly, and recklessly with extreme indifference to human life or during the course of a serious felony (as robbery or rape).

I don’t know what kind of bigot it must make me to dare believe that those rights would apply to the life of a human who has committed NO sin and done no wrong?

Deuteronomy 27:25

"Cursed is the man who accepts a bribe to kill an innocent person."…

Would that ONLY apply to an abortion doctor or would it also apply to a person who votes for somebody who is pro-abortion, so that they may receive welfare in any form? You decide! It’s your cursed soul if you decide wrong.

~Because of this vehement belief I am a REPUBLICAN,

NO MATTER WHAT, unless they are pro-choice!

I would never vote for anybody who believes abortion is okay. Obama and Clinton BOTH vote pro-abortion EVERY single opportunity they get. They even voted against Lacy’s Law. Voting against it is stating that when a crime committed against a pregnant woman results in the death of her baby, that perpetrator is charged with NO extra crime beyond the crime against the Mother.

Proverbs 6-

16  There are six things the LORD hates,
       seven that are detestable to him:

 17  haughty eyes,
       a lying tongue, 
       hands that shed innocent blood,

 18  a heart that devises wicked schemes,
       feet that are quick to rush into evil,

 19  a false witness who pours out lies
       and a man who stirs up dissension among brothers.

It is ironic how as a Republican I am automatically seen as prejudiced!

Republicans have done more for civil rights than ANY party in any time.

After all, did Abe Lincoln (a Republican) do NOTHING for the black race?

Is it NOT racist to celebrate Martin Luther King Jr. and to IGNORE the accomplishments of Abraham Lincoln?

You tell me, is it because Lincoln did less for blacks than King?

OR is it because Lincoln is white?

Lincoln died because of his civil rights beliefs also and a liberal Democrat sympathizer killed him.

I wish people would REALLY start seeing one another as equals, like they claim to want!

We need to wipe the slate clean. Remove all racially biased programs and organizations from government, such as Affirmative Action. Then stop promoting violence against others of any race, EVEN in MUSIC.

Does that mean I am for censorship and against freedom of speech?

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

 Abridging= shortening, restricting or depriving

Answer this: IF I worked around classified government documents and I SPOKE of that classified information to the Taliban and later caused the death of thousands of innocent people, would that be protected by my freedom of speech?

That freedom is limited when you are putting other people in danger. So what about the police officers who rappers talk about shooting? Do they not deserve protection? That freedom is yet another freedom perverted by liberal lawyers and politicians to give them a loophole to slander and endanger others at will. Until the 20^th Century, people were moral enough to have no need to battle in court for that first amendment freedom, but that was before the country strayed from it’s Christian values so far.

And what about:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”? Are the liberals in Congress not violating that portion of the First Amendment with the laws taking God out of schools and forcing people to say Happy Holidays instead of Merry Christmas?

We don’t get it both ways, libs!

I have the utmost respect for any black person who doesn’t hate me or my entire race for the past and who believes in TRUE equality, not the latest liberal venom spewed upon them to convince them the Democrats are the ONLY ones who are not against them.

The Republican Party was created as a split from the Democratic-Republican Party, leaving the liberals (Democrats) and their pro-slavery platform. They split the parties with a primary goal of abolishing slavery. REPUBLICAN= civil rights (NOT perverted unconstitutional ones, like fought for today)/ DEMOCRATS = Pro-slavery.

Look for yourself at a 124 years side by side civil rights platform comparison:

http://www.wallbuilders.com/resources/misc/CivilRightsPlatforms.pdf

I grew up next door to a very successful black family in OH and the only difference I knew between us was- a tan, until I moved to FL. There I attempted friendships with kids of all races. I was shunned by the majority of black people I tried to befriend and white people were equally obtuse toward me when I attempted inter-racial friendships. As I became old enough to date, I was attracted to boys with blonde hair and blue or green eyes, which never changed. The black males suddenly opened their minds to me. However, I had no interest in dating them, so I was labeled a racist. To this day, I am uncertain why my taste in men made me prejudice??? After all, I was the one who was shunned by the majority of blacks who I tried to befriend, but since I wouldn’t have sex with a black boy, I was the racist?

The black family I was brought up next door to in Ohio was like my family. I loved them very much until the day they died and I still love their kids or grandkids who are still alive. My older sisters were the same age as their two daughters and they were best friends. The Mother was my mentor and protector. She was a wonderful person. They were self-educated intelligent Christian people. They (the Mother and Father) grew up in the midst of the civil rights movement and were never handed anything. They got their business running without handouts, grants, affirmative action or welfare and they managed to become a highly respected fixture in my home town without any of those things. They were very aware and alert of the fact that those programs (handouts) would ruin many blacks. And it unfortunately did! However, I do believe people can change, but first they have to stop listening to liberals who want to make them believe they are owed something by our white government and our white people and start getting back to biblical principals and standards to govern their actions. People like Condoleezza Rice are living up to their potential and not judging others by color. She is somebody to set a standard for black women, not some gansta B- baby mama.

The Second Coming of Ross Perot

Or is it possibly the second coming of Pat Robertson?

Don't forget, Pat showed his true colors this election cycle, by backing Giuliani. Hopefully Conservatives will see through the instant replay of 1992, before it’s too late.

What am I talking about?

I’m talking about Bob Barr, who is supposedly the Great White Hope of the far Right Conservatives. Ironically, my research into him took MUCH less time than my research of McCain. It seems that he only votes on a few issues here and there, leaving the majority of issues up to the old school people. Kennedy is an old school Senator. There are many Kennedys in Congress with other names.

Now, fellow Conservatives looking for a 3^rd Party miracle pulled out of the rear of your new “Great White Hope”, check this out:

With all of Barr’s 2 ½ tallied votes, he rates 80% on fiscal Conservative issues. Okay- 2 ½ is a slight exaggeration, but you get my point. Do you know where McCain rates after multitudes of votes? You got it- 80% on all issues. There goes Barr’s new title as the Great White Conservative hope. I admit, he has never lost a point on social issues, but he has also rarely voted on them.

Does anybody want to know why the rebirth of Perot/ Robertson rates so low?

He wants to pull our troops from Iraq. Yes, on the issue of war, he is another Ron Paul. He is a separatist nut-job. He basically doesn’t care that 9/11 has brought the war to our soil. He doesn’t care about the threats to our country that are brewing abroad. He doesn’t care how many of our young men and women have died for the cause of peace. He wants us to pull out and stay out of it. All of that with so few votes in his docket that we have no idea where he truly stands, except that he rarely bothers to stand up and vote. With all of the recent abortion legislation, his last vote on the issue was in 2001. That makes me sick! While I admit, I haven’t researched his private life, to see if maybe he has been ill and out of commission for the last 7 years with all of the missed pro-life votes, I have researched his voting record (as short as it is). That voting record shows voting, although minimal, during those 7 years.

Ask yourself folks; is that what we need in a president?

Not that he has a miniscule chance of obtaining the oval office, but he can certainly get in the way of a McCain victory over whatever evil-doer wins the Democratic nomination.

Let me see, do I want a war hero or a cut-n-run kid in the oval office when we are at war?

For those who haven’t read my prior articles related to 3^rd party politics:

Why do I say that he is the rebirth of Ross or Pat?

Because: With nearly no political voting history to hold him accountable, he is waging a war of dissension on the GOP. He is splitting the GOP vote, just as Robertson/ Perot did for George H. W. Bush. It has ALWAYS been unsuccessful throughout history to attempt this, that is, if you are a Republican. When Republicans do this throughout history, it ALWAYS lands the Democrats in the oval office. This time, the Democrats are more evil than ever in history.

This leads me to ask:

Who is funding the Barr for President Campaign?

Maybe it’s the DNC through a modicum of dummy names?

Wake up and get on the straight-talk express or you’ll cause our nation a great big mess.